Click Here to return to the
Blue Collar Politics Blog.To a Directory of Mr.Lederman's Essays
George W. Bush Conspiracy?
by Robert Lederman
robert.lederman@worldnet.att.net
December 5, 2000Boston Globe - 12/11/2000
Conspiracy theories on election abound
By Anne E. Kornblut, Globe Staff
AUSTIN, Texas - Robert Lederman spies a conspiracy around virtually every corner of American government, and nowhere more so than in the post-election drama playing out in Florida.
Lederman, 50, a Democratic activist, spotted signs of a sinister plot from the moment Florida Governor Jeb Bush flew home after election night. Since then, the rulings by various courts and elections officials have only conficonfirmed his worst suspicion: the existence of a ''vast right-wing conspiracy,'' probably tied to the CIA, orchestrated to win the White House for George W. Bush.
Wasn't it obvious that Secretary of State Katherine Harris certified the vote under orders from Jeb Bush? Was it just coincidence that Republicans took ballots home in Seminole and Martin counties - and were never punished? Didn't the media cover the whole thing up?
''Of course the whole thing is a setup,'' Lederman said, scoffing at the notion Al Gore suffered legitimate legal setbacks.
Like a modern-day Kennedy assassination, the ongoing intrigue over the Florida ballots has drawn conspiracy theorists out of the woodwork, prompting wild tales of subversion and deceit by Republicans desperate to regain office. But the suspicions are not limited to Democratic activists who, like Lederman, view conspiracy hunting as a full-time job; even more tempered Democrats say they are skeptical about a string of events in Florida and in Washington that seem so heavily stacked.
While few Democratic officials have accused their opponents of plotting an actual ''conspiracy,'' many say they do not believe the various setbacks for Gore were all based purely on reasonable assessments of the law, separate and apart from the political views of the judges and elections officials who were in charge of each decision along the way. At the very least, they said, there are clear signs of partisanship and GOP networking, although Gore himself has steered clear of accusing the judicial branch of grounding its decisions in politics.
''There are some people who feel it's a conspiracy,'' said Phil Johnston, chairman of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, who said he has been ''flooded'' with phone calls from Democratic supporters since Nov. 7. ''I don't think there's any evidence to support that, and I think the vice president has been careful to refrain from that kind of rhetoric, but I think among many activist Democrats there is a sense that this election in Florida was not on the level.''
Bruce Buchanan, a political science professor at the University of Texas, said there was at least a marginal ''cause for concern, because so many of the players at every level were partisans whose motives were at least suspect if not demonstrably partisan.''
''That said, though, I've watched pretty closely, and everybody who's taken action, with the possible exception of the Legislature, has had legal cover,'' Buchanan said. ''When you're caught up in a fight, there's a greater tendency to perceive malfeasance.''
Almost without exception, partisans have interpreted each turn of events through a political lens, casting favorable decisions as reasonable and unfavorable ones as the result of political bias. And rarely has a judge been given credit for ruling contrary to his political party; last Friday, when Judge Nikki Clark refused to a Democratic request to throw out absentee ballots in one Florida county, there was little mention that she did so despite being a liberal Democrat herself.
Like the Democrats, Republicans have smelled a rat at times as well, especially in the decisions by the Florida Supreme Court, which on two occasions ruled in favor of Gore against a tidal wave of protest from Bush supporters. In particular, the ruling last week to restart the manual ballot recount prompted accusations that the seven justices were acting on their partisan convictions rather than the letter of the law.
But Republican complaints of a Democratic ''conspiracy,'' while occasionally more vocal, have been limited, in part because developments since Nov. 7 have generally favored Bush. No one has implicated President Clinton in an undercover effort to win the White House for Gore, for example, or suggested that Florida's Democratic senator, Bob Graham, personally orchestrated the ballot recount.
And Republicans ridicule Democratic concerns, of both a secret plot and of partisanship, as sour grapes.
''I would say if this is a conspiracy, it's one of the most incompetent conspiracies in American political history,'' said John Yoo, a professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley, ''If you were really going to steal an election, why would you steal it by 540 votes?''
The decision by the US Supreme Court over the weekend to halt the manual recount and schedule a hearing for today was met with another round of outrage from Democrats, who saw the 5-4 split among the justices as a troubling sign of political bias. After its previous 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court had been viewed as the last outpost of nonpartisan reason in the election drama; how they rule after today's hearing could determine public opinion of the court for decades to come.
Although conspiracy theorists will certainly continue their quest regardless of the outcome, some political analysts feared a split decision by the Supreme Court after today could raise doubts among even the most trusting citizens about the judiciary's ability to act outside political realm. Professor Erwin Chemerinsky, who teaches law at the University of Southern California, said the Saturday order to stop recount alone hurt the image of the court, now ''tarnished in the eyes of many people. It's seen as another political player,'' Chemerinsky said.
''In some sense, the mask has fallen and you can see what's really going on. ... It's very demoralizing to me,'' said Mary Cheh, a law professor at George Washington University. ''The court doesn't have many resources, but what it does have is the good will ... of the people.''
This story ran on page 13 of the Boston Globe on 12/11/2000.
(c) Copyright 2000 Globe Newspaper Company.
For the text of this article go to here
If the page has expired, go to: Search Boston Globe, enter LedermanIn accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this Boston Globe article is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
To a Directory of Mr.Lederman's Essays
Robert Lederman is an artist, writer and activist and is also the President of the street artist advocacy group, A.R.T.I.S.T.
Click here for an archive of A.R.T.I.S.T. related news articles on the Freedom Forum websiteHis essays and Op-Eds have appeared in hundreds of alternative publications as well as the Daily News, Penthouse, Africa Sun Times, Street News and The Shadow.
Lederman was falsely arrested 41 times for his anti-Giuliani activities and was never convicted of any of the charges. As a result of the arrests, he's won four Federal lawsuits and overturned three laws.
He is best known for having created hundreds of paintings of Mayor Giuliani as a Hitler like dictator which were carried in demonstrations throughout the eight years of the Giuliani administration. Images of his paintings and articles about his arrests and lawsuits have appeared on all of the major television networks hundreds of times as well as frequently appearing in the NY Times, Daily News, NY Post, Newsday, Newsweek, People, The Washington Post, LA Times and NY Magazine.Robert Lederman,
President of A.R.T.I.S.T.
(Artists' Response To Illegal State Tactics)
robert.lederman@worldnet.att.net
For a detailed exposition on the West Nile issue
http://www.nospray.org/
For an article on the Manhattan Institute go to
http://www.konformist.com/2000/rudyg.htmIf you would like to help oppose the spraying,
please write to the
No Spray Coalition
PO Box 334
Peck Slip Station
NYC, NY 10272-0334
or call the No Spray hotline at (718) 670-7110.Any funds you can send to help continue the lawsuit
and this work are greatly appreciated.Important Note:
Mr. Lederman has explained that his articles posted here are not to be taken as official statements by the No-Spray Coalition of which he is a member or of the "No-Spray" lawsuit in which he is a plaintiff.Blue Collar Pundit Essays
Searching for the Breach in
Alice’s Looking Glass WorldMy America
Oh Say, Can You See?
FREEDOM!
War isn't Hell!
God is Starting to Scare Me!
It's All Part of the Plan!
Turning the World Wide Web Into
a Tower of Politically Sanitized BabelAnd by clicking here, you'll see an old suggestion (May 2003) of how Democrats could/should have protested the Republican convention and G.W. Bush.
This site is under construction
Contact: Jack Ballinger at: Pundit@BlueCollarPolitics.com
For a great source of general tenant information,
visit the Tenant Net Home Page |©2005 Baltech Productions. All rights reserved.
